scooter: be allowed in skateparks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.74
, bike
Weight: 0.72
, toy
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings segway
Weight: 0.56
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.40
, car
Weight: 0.39
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.38
, van
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed in skateparks 1.00
be allowed at skateparks 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bike, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bike, be allowed in skateparks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bike, be allowed in skateparks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bike, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(scooter, be allowed at skateparks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(scooter, be allowed at skateparks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scooter, be allowed at skateparks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(scooter, be allowed at skateparks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bike, be allowed in skateparks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(scooter, be allowed in skateparks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bike, be allowed in skateparks)