score: be at sport event

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, bonus
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings play game
Weight: 0.34
, win
Weight: 0.33
, golf ball
Weight: 0.32
, victory
Weight: 0.32
, tie
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport event 1.00
be used to good sport 0.87
requires be good sport 0.85
be important in sport 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(time, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(score, be at sport event)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(time, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(time, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(play game, requires be good sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(time, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(score, be at sport event)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(play game, requires be good sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(play game, requires be good sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(score, be at sport event)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(score, be at sport event)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(score, be at sport event)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(time, be important in sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(play game, requires be good sport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(score, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(time, be important in sport)