scotch tape: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tape
Weight: 0.75
, item
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings adhesive tape
Weight: 0.38
, magnetic tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.36
, scotch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(scotch tape, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tape, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tape, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(adhesive tape, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(duct tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(duct tape, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(adhesive tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(adhesive tape, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(scotch tape, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(scotch tape, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tape, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(duct tape, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(adhesive tape, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(scotch tape, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tape, was invented)