scotch: be aged 12 years

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be aged 12 years 1.00
is aged 0.95
is aged longer than bourbon 0.80
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.79
be better with age 0.78
be more costly than aged port 0.77
get better with age 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, get better with age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better with age)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, get better with age)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is aged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(scotch, get better with age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(scotch, be better with age)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(scotch, get better with age)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(scotch, get better with age)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scotch, get better with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bourbon, is aged)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)