scotch: be better with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better with age 1.00
get better with age 0.98
improve with age 0.89
be aged 12 years 0.78
has quality better 0.77
is aged 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whiskey, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(whiskey, is aged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, get better with age)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better with age)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, get better with age)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whiskey, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(whiskey, is aged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bourbon, is aged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is aged)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bourbon, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(scotch, be better with age)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(scotch, get better with age)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(scotch, improve with age)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scotch, improve with age)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(scotch, get better with age)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(scotch, get better with age)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scotch, improve with age)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scotch, get better with age)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(scotch, improve with age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(scotch, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(scotch, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(scotch, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scotch, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bourbon, is aged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bourbon, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(scotch, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality better)