scotch: be more expensive than bourbon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than bourbon 1.00
be more expensive than whiskey 0.92
is aged longer than bourbon 0.92
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.91
be better than whiskey 0.89
be aged in bourbon barrels 0.85
be different from whiskey 0.85
be served in brandy balloon 0.76
be called scotch 0.76
be more refreshing than ones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be called scotch)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(scotch, be called scotch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(scotch, be called scotch)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scotch, be called scotch)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be called scotch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whiskey, be called scotch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whiskey, be called scotch)