scotch: improve with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve with age 1.00
be better with age 0.89
get better with age 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scotch, improve with age)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scotch, improve with age)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, get better with age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better with age)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, get better with age)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scotch, improve with age)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scotch, improve with age)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(scotch, improve with age)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scotch, get better with age)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(scotch, get better with age)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(scotch, be better with age)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(scotch, get better with age)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(scotch, get better with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(scotch, improve with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scotch, improve with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(scotch, improve with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)