scotch: is aged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is aged 1.00
be aged 12 years 0.95
is aged longer than bourbon 0.81
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.79
be more costly than aged port 0.77
be better with age 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better with age)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whiskey, be better with age)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is aged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better with age)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(scotch, be better with age)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better with age)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scotch, be better with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bourbon, is aged)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better with age)