screening: be for cancer important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents intervention
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.58
, application
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32
, stress test
Weight: 0.32
, check
Weight: 0.31
, surveillance
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for cancer important 1.00
be important cancer 0.99
be for cancer 0.97
be for cervical cancer important 0.85
be important cervical cancer 0.84
be for cervical cancer 0.82
be for autism important 0.79
be important for autism 0.79
be important for health 0.78
protect from disease 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(intervention, be important for autism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intervention, be for autism important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(intervention, be for autism important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for autism)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be for autism important)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for autism)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, be important for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, protect from disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(intervention, be important for autism)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intervention, be for autism important)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(surveillance, be important for health)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(surveillance, be important for health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vaccination, protect from disease)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(vaccination, protect from disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(screening, be for cancer important)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(screening, be important cancer)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cancer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(screening, be for cancer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(screening, be important cancer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cancer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(screening, be important cervical cancer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cervical cancer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(screening, be important cervical cancer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cervical cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(intervention, be for autism important)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for autism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(surveillance, be important for health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vaccination, protect from disease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(intervention, be for autism important)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for autism)