screening: be important cancer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents intervention
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.58
, application
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32
, stress test
Weight: 0.32
, check
Weight: 0.31
, surveillance
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important cancer 1.00
be for cancer important 0.99
be for cancer 0.97
be for cervical cancer important 0.86
be important cervical cancer 0.85
be for cervical cancer 0.83
be for autism important 0.78
be important for autism 0.78
protect from disease 0.76
protect from infectious disease 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(intervention, be important for autism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cancer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intervention, be for autism important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cancer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(intervention, be for autism important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for autism)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be for autism important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for autism)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, protect from infectious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, protect from disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(intervention, be important for autism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(screening, be important cancer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intervention, be for autism important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(screening, be important cancer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vaccination, protect from disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(vaccination, protect from disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(vaccination, protect from infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vaccination, protect from infectious disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(screening, be important cancer)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer important)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(screening, be for cancer important)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(screening, be for cancer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(screening, be for cancer)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cancer important)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cancer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cervical cancer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(screening, be important cervical cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(screening, be important cervical cancer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cancer important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cervical cancer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(screening, be for cervical cancer important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cervical cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screening, be important cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(intervention, be for autism important)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for autism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vaccination, protect from disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vaccination, protect from infectious disease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(intervention, be for autism important)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(screening, be important cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for autism)