screening: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents intervention
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.58
, application
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32
, stress test
Weight: 0.32
, check
Weight: 0.31
, surveillance
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(surveillance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(surveillance, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(screening, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(screening, jobs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(screening, jobs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(screening, jobs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(screening, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(screening, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(screening, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, has state jobs)