screening: stop at 65

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents intervention
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.58
, application
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32
, stress test
Weight: 0.32
, check
Weight: 0.31
, surveillance
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
stop at 65 1.00
stop at 64 1.00
start at 101 0.80
stop responding 0.78
be at out 11 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(application, stop responding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(screening, stop at 65)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(application, stop responding)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(application, stop responding)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(check, start at 101)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(check, be at out 11)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(application, stop responding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(screening, stop at 65)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(check, start at 101) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, start at 101)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(check, be at out 11) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(check, be at out 11)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(screening, stop at 65)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 64)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(screening, stop at 64)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(screening, stop at 64)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(screening, stop at 64)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(screening, stop at 65)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(application, stop responding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(check, start at 101)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(check, be at out 11)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(screening, stop at 65) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(application, stop responding)