sea cucumber: has quality uses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, echinoderm
Weight: 0.64
, shellfish
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings sea snail
Weight: 0.37
, sea bass
Weight: 0.37
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, sea lion
Weight: 0.36
, shrimp
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality uses 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(seafood, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sea cucumber, has quality uses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(seafood, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(seafood, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(seafood, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sea cucumber, has quality uses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(sea cucumber, has quality uses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sea cucumber, has quality uses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(seafood, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(seafood, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sea cucumber, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality bad)