seafood restaurant: be at maine

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, business
Weight: 0.59
, attraction
Weight: 0.57
, beach
Weight: 0.54
Siblings grill
Weight: 0.59
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at maine 1.00
be at michigan 0.77
be at florida 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at maine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at maine)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(seafood restaurant, be at maine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at maine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at maine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at florida)