seafood: be bad for gout

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for gout 1.00
have cholesterol 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be bad for gout)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, have cholesterol)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shellfish, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(shellfish, be bad for gout)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shellfish, have cholesterol)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shellfish, have cholesterol)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(seafood, be bad for gout)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(seafood, have cholesterol)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(seafood, be bad for gout)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for gout)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(shellfish, have cholesterol)