seafood: be better than meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than meat 1.00
is meat 0.91
is expensive meat 0.90
be more disliked than meat 0.89
is most expensive meat 0.88
be from colder waters tastier 0.78
be from waters tastier 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tuna, is meat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tuna, is meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(seafood, be better than meat)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(seafood, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(seafood, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(seafood, is meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(seafood, be more disliked than meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be more disliked than meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(seafood, be more disliked than meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(seafood, be more disliked than meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(seafood, be from waters tastier)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be from colder waters tastier)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(seafood, be from colder waters tastier)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(seafood, be from waters tastier)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(seafood, be from colder waters tastier)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(seafood, be from colder waters tastier)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be from waters tastier)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(seafood, be from waters tastier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(seafood, be better than meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be better than meat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tuna, is meat)