seafood: be expensive in seattle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in seattle 1.00
be expensive in alaska 0.84
be popular in hawaii 0.80
be expensive in australia 0.78
be popular in japan 0.78
be expensive in uk 0.78
be important to louisiana 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)