seafood: be important to louisiana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to louisiana 1.00
be expensive in alaska 0.79
be expensive in seattle 0.76
be popular in japan 0.76
be popular in hawaii 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)