seagull: be protected in michigan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.54
, predator
Weight: 0.46
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, gull
Weight: 0.39
, heron
Weight: 0.39
, pelican
Weight: 0.38
, blue bird
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected in michigan 1.00
be protected in uk 0.85
be in ohio 0.82
be in utah 0.82
be protected species in australia 0.81
be in colorado 0.80
be in oklahoma 0.78
be in kansas 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in colorado)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in kansas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pelican, be in kansas)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in kansas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pelican, be in colorado)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in colorado)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(seagull, be in ohio)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(seagull, be in ohio)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be in ohio)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(seagull, be in ohio)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seagull, be protected in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(seagull, be in utah)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(seagull, be in colorado)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(seagull, be protected species in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(seagull, be in oklahoma)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(seagull, be protected in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(seagull, be in utah)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(seagull, be in colorado)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be in colorado)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seagull, be in oklahoma)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be in utah)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(seagull, be protected species in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be in oklahoma)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(seagull, be in colorado)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(seagull, be in utah)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(seagull, be protected in uk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(seagull, be in oklahoma)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected species in australia)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(seagull, be protected species in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(seagull, be protected in michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pelican, be in colorado)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be protected in michigan)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pelican, be in kansas)