seal: be bad hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.62
, special force
Weight: 0.60
, force
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.57
Siblings blue whale
Weight: 0.33
, whale shark
Weight: 0.33
, dolphin
Weight: 0.33
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.33
, whale
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad hunting 1.00
be good hunting 0.98
be important hunting 0.95
hunt 0.83
be hunted 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(seal, be bad hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(seal, be good hunting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(seal, be good hunting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(seal, be important hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(seal, be important hunting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(seal, be good hunting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(seal, hunt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(seal, be good hunting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seal, hunt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(seal, be important hunting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(seal, be hunted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(seal, hunt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(seal, be hunted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seal, be important hunting)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(seal, be hunted)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(seal, be hunted)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(seal, hunt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(seal, be bad hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seal, be bad hunting)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(seal, be bad hunting)