seattle: be better than vancouver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than vancouver 1.00
be better than portland 0.82
be warmer than denver 0.80
be warmer than chicago 0.79
get less rain than austin 0.78
be warmer than york 0.77
be bigger than tacoma 0.76
be warmer than new york 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be warmer than new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer than new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer than new york)