seattle: be covered in smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in smoke 1.00
have smoke 0.91
be filled with smoke 0.89
be full of smoke 0.88
is air smoke 0.87
has quality smoke 0.87
be covered in ash 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(seattle, is air smoke)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(seattle, have smoke)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(seattle, is air smoke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seattle, have smoke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(seattle, is air smoke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(seattle, have smoke)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have smoke)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is air smoke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san jose, has quality smoke)