seattle: has quality smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality smoke 1.00
have smoke 0.95
is air smoke 0.92
be full of smoke 0.91
be covered in smoke 0.87
be filled with smoke 0.87
is smoky 0.77
is air quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is smoky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(san jose, is smoky)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(san jose, is smoky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(seattle, is air smoke)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(seattle, have smoke)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(seattle, have smoke)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(seattle, is air smoke)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(seattle, is air smoke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seattle, have smoke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(seattle, be covered in smoke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be full of smoke)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be filled with smoke)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have smoke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(seattle, is air quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(seattle, is smoky)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(seattle, is air quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(seattle, is air quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is air smoke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(seattle, is smoky)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(seattle, is smoky)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is smoky)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is air quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san jose, has quality smoke)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(san jose, is smoky)