seattle: have famous areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have famous areas 1.00
is famous 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new york, is famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san francisco, is famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(new york, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is famous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is famous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(new york, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new york, is famous)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san francisco, is famous)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chicago, is famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(chicago, is famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(las vegas, is famous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(new york city, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(new york city, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(seattle, have famous areas)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(seattle, is famous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(seattle, is famous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(seattle, is famous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(san francisco, is famous)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chicago, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(las vegas, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(san francisco, is famous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, is famous)