second: be important normal form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.59
, position
Weight: 0.57
, hit
Weight: 0.57
Siblings millisecond
Weight: 0.45
, third
Weight: 0.37
, first
Weight: 0.36
, third base
Weight: 0.36
, fourth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important normal form 1.00
be important form 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(third, be important normal form)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(third, be important form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(third, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(third, be important normal form)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(third, be important form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third, be important form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(second, be important normal form)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(second, be important form)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(second, be important form)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(second, be important form)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(second, be important form)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(second, be important normal form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(second, be important normal form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(third, be important normal form)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(second, be important normal form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(third, be important form)