secretary: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents director
Weight: 0.67
, assistant
Weight: 0.66
, office worker
Weight: 0.65
, worker
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, chief
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, executive
Weight: 0.35
, minister
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be find in office 0.91
be vote into office 0.80
be used to organize office 0.79
mean to organize office 0.78
be at desk 0.78
be defined as name of high political office 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(office worker, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(secretary, be at office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(worker, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(secretary, be at office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(worker, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(secretary, be at office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(worker, be at office)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(worker, be at desk)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(office worker, be at office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(worker, be at office)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office worker, be at office)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(worker, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(president, be vote into office)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(president, be defined as name of high political office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(office worker, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(secretary, be at office)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(worker, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(secretary, be at office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(worker, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(secretary, be at office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(president, be defined as name of high political office)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(president, be defined as name of high political office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(president, be vote into office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(president, be vote into office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(secretary, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(secretary, be find in office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(secretary, be used to organize office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(secretary, mean to organize office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(secretary, be find in office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(secretary, be find in office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be find in office)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(secretary, be used to organize office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(secretary, mean to organize office)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(secretary, mean to organize office)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(secretary, mean to organize office)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(secretary, be used to organize office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be used to organize office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(secretary, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(office worker, be at office)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(worker, be at office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(worker, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(president, be defined as name of high political office)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(president, be vote into office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(office worker, be at office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(worker, be at office)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(secretary, be at office)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(worker, be at desk)