section: is waiter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.64
, provision
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.62
Siblings paragraph
Weight: 0.64
, sidebar
Weight: 0.63
, north
Weight: 0.59
, menu
Weight: 0.59
, frontal lobe
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is waiter 1.00
be important for restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(section, is waiter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(section, is waiter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(section, is waiter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(section, is waiter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(menu, be important for restaurant)