sector: be better than public

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than public 1.00
be more effective than public sector 0.86
be better than private transport 0.85
be better than cars 0.83
be better than transport 0.82
be better for environment 0.80
be more effective than sector 0.79
is more important 0.78
be accountable to public 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sector, be better than public)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sector, be accountable to public)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sector, be accountable to public)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sector, is more important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sector, be accountable to public)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sector, be accountable to public)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)