sector: be called agricultural sector

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called agricultural sector 1.00
be called agriculture 0.91
be called sector 0.90
be dependent on sector 0.84
be dependent on primary sector 0.81
be more effective than public sector 0.81
be more effective than sector 0.80
affect market for music industries 0.79
be important to country 's economy 0.77
be in economy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to country 's economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(industry, be important to country 's economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to country 's economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sector, be called sector)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sector, be called sector)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be called agriculture)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sector, be in economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(sector, be called sector)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(sector, be in economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sector, be called agriculture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agriculture)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sector, be called agriculture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called sector)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country 's economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)