sector: be considered backbone of development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered backbone of development 1.00
backbone of development 0.97
be considered backbone 0.95
be considered as backbone 0.94
be considered as backbone of economy 0.90
be important for development meritnation 0.82
be important for development 0.82
has state development 0.78
have impact on development 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sector, be considered backbone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sector, backbone of development)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sector, backbone of development)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered as backbone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sector, be considered as backbone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, backbone of development)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sector, be considered as backbone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sector, backbone of development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sector, has state development)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered as backbone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)