sector: be more effective than public sector

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more effective than public sector 1.00
be more effective than sector 0.97
be called sector 0.86
be better than public 0.86
be dependent on sector 0.82
be dependent on primary sector 0.82
be better than private transport 0.82
be called agricultural sector 0.81
be better than transport 0.78
affect market for music industries 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sector, be called sector)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(sector, be called sector)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sector, be called sector)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called sector)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sector, be better than public)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sector, be dependent on sector)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sector, be dependent on primary sector)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than private transport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)