sector: be popular in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in africa 1.00
be important in africa 0.95
be popular in south africa 0.95
be important in south africa 0.91
become in india 0.78
be in london expensive 0.78
be expensive in london 0.78
be in india work 0.77
is new england 0.77
be successful in italy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in india work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, be successful in italy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(industry, be successful in italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be in india work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in india work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sector, be popular in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sector, be important in africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sector, be important in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sector, be important in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in south africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sector, become in india)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sector, is new england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sector, is new england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in south africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sector, is new england)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sector, is new england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(public transport, be in india work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in italy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london expensive)