sector: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality standard 0.83
has quality news 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality virtue 0.76
be bad in us 0.76
be better for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unit, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(unit, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sector, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sector, has quality news)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)