sector: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sector, has quality news)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sector, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)