sector: is more important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more important 1.00
be important to gilgamesh 0.89
be important 40 0.89
be important for us 0.84
be important for country 0.82
be important to country 0.80
be important in business 0.79
be significant for us 0.79
be in sport important to us 0.79
be more effective than sector 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(industry, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(industry, be important for country)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(industry, be important to country)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(industry, be significant for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sector, is more important)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)