sector: job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
job 1.00
jobs 0.81
has state jobs 0.80
work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(segment, work)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(segment, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(segment, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(segment, work)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sector, job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sector, job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(financial institution, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(oil company, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(oil company, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sector, job)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sector, jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(sector, jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sector, jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sector, jobs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sector, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(segment, work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oil company, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(segment, work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)