security guard: man his post

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.77
, employee
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, worker
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bouncer
Weight: 0.47
, police
Weight: 0.35
, firewall
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
man his post 1.00
gain money from his boss 0.76
man station 0.76
answer to his boss 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, answer to his boss)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security guard, man his post)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(worker, gain money from his boss)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security guard, man his post)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(worker, gain money from his boss)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(worker, answer to his boss)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, answer to his boss)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(worker, gain money from his boss)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, answer to his boss)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(security guard, man his post)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(worker, gain money from his boss)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(security guard, man his post)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(security guard, man his post)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(security guard, man his post)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security guard, man his post)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(worker, answer to his boss)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(worker, gain money from his boss)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(worker, answer to his boss)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security guard, man his post)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(worker, gain money from his boss)