security guard: wear sunglasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.77
, employee
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, worker
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bouncer
Weight: 0.47
, prison guard
Weight: 0.37
, state police
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear sunglasses 1.00
wear suits with dress shoes 0.85
wear black 0.83
wear suits 0.81
wear uniforms 0.81
wear badges 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(police officer, wear black)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear black)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, wear sunglasses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(police, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(police officer, wear black)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bouncer, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(bouncer, wear sunglasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(police, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bouncer, wear black)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bouncer, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(security guard, wear badges)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(security guard, wear black)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear badges)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(security guard, wear suits)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear black)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(security guard, wear badges)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear badges)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(security guard, wear black)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bouncer, wear sunglasses)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bouncer, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear black)