security guard: wear taekwondo uniforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.77
, employee
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, worker
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bouncer
Weight: 0.47
, prison guard
Weight: 0.37
, state police
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear taekwondo uniforms 1.00
wear uniforms 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(police, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(police, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(police, wear uniforms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(security guard, wear taekwondo uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)