security: be handled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, fundamental
Weight: 0.62
, job
Weight: 0.61
, solution
Weight: 0.61
Siblings security system
Weight: 0.72
, social security number
Weight: 0.68
, computer virus
Weight: 0.64
, treasury
Weight: 0.59
, police dog
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be handled 1.00
be handled in free market system 0.83
be handled in angular 2 0.77
be crucial in handling 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(security, be handled)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(security, be handled in free market system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(security, be handled in free market system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(security, be handled in free market system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(security, be handled in angular 2)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(security, be crucial in handling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(security, be handled in free market system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(security, be handled in angular 2)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(security, be crucial in handling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(security, be handled in angular 2)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(security, be crucial in handling)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(security, be handled in angular 2)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(security, be crucial in handling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(security, be handled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(security, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(security, be handled)