security: be important in wirless network

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, fundamental
Weight: 0.62
, job
Weight: 0.61
, solution
Weight: 0.61
Siblings security system
Weight: 0.72
, social security number
Weight: 0.68
, computer virus
Weight: 0.64
, treasury
Weight: 0.59
, police dog
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in wirless network 1.00
be important in network 0.91
be important in wireless networks 0.90
be important in networks 0.87
be ensured for home wireless network 0.84
using access servers on network 0.83
be on internet important 0.79
be important on internet 0.79
be ensured for home network 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(security, be important in wirless network)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(security, be ensured for home wireless network)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(security, be ensured for home wireless network)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(security, be ensured for home wireless network)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(security, be ensured for home wireless network)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(security, using access servers on network)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(security, using access servers on network)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(security, using access servers on network)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(security, using access servers on network)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security, be on internet important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security, be important on internet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(security, be important on internet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(security, be important on internet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(security, be important on internet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(security, be on internet important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security, be on internet important)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(security, be on internet important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(security, be important in wirless network)