security: has quality question

Related concepts

Parents	crime Weight: 0.66 , fundamental Weight: 0.62 , job Weight: 0.61 , solution Weight: 0.61
Siblings	security system Weight: 0.72 , social security number Weight: 0.68 , computer virus Weight: 0.64 , treasury Weight: 0.59 , police dog Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality question	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(computer virus, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(security, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(security, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(security, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(security, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality question)