seeing: is is hit in nuts funny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experience
Weight: 0.50
, term
Weight: 0.49
, function
Weight: 0.49
, characteristic
Weight: 0.48
, activity
Weight: 0.45
Siblings thinking
Weight: 0.30
, business activity
Weight: 0.30
, sight
Weight: 0.30
, like
Weight: 0.30
, feel
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is hit in nuts funny 1.00
is is hit in nuts 0.95
is is hit funny 0.91
is when crazy 0.84
is crazy 0.84
is is hit 0.80
be fall over hilarious 0.79
weird 0.79
is scary 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(thinking, is when crazy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(thinking, is crazy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(thinking, is scary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(feel, weird)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(thinking, is crazy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(thinking, is crazy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(thinking, is when crazy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(thinking, is when crazy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(thinking, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(thinking, is scary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(feel, weird) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(feel, weird)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit funny)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(seeing, is is hit funny)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(seeing, is is hit funny)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(seeing, is is hit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seeing, is is hit funny)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(seeing, be fall over hilarious)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(seeing, is is hit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seeing, is is hit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(seeing, be fall over hilarious)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seeing, be fall over hilarious)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(seeing, be fall over hilarious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(thinking, is when crazy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thinking, is crazy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(feel, weird)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seeing, is is hit in nuts funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(thinking, is scary)