sega: be better than nintendo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.55
, publisher
Weight: 0.49
, client
Weight: 0.49
, system
Weight: 0.47
, sony
Weight: 0.46
Siblings nintendo
Weight: 0.33
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.32
, philips
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than nintendo 1.00
is nintendo 0.95
be much more superior to nintendo 0.95
be better than nintendo switch 0.95
be part of nintendo 0.95
is nintendo switch 0.90
gain market share from nintendo 0.84
be part of sony 0.83
is japanese meaning 0.77
be called sega 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sega, is nintendo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(sega, is nintendo)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sega, be part of sony)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sega, is nintendo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sega, be called sega)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sega, be part of sony)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sega, be called sega)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sega, is nintendo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sega, be part of sony)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sega, is japanese meaning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(sega, be called sega)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sega, is japanese meaning)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sega, is japanese meaning)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sega, be part of sony)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(sega, is japanese meaning)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sega, be called sega)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)