segregation: was different in north

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.61
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings slavery
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, apartheid
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, assimilation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was different in north 1.00
was enforced in south 0.79
was practiced in southern states 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(segregation, was different in north)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was enforced in south)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced in southern states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was different in north)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(segregation, was different in north)