segregation: was practiced despite passage following civil war

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.61
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings slavery
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, apartheid
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, assimilation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was practiced despite passage following civil war 1.00
was practiced despite passage following war 0.97
was practiced despite passage of amendments following civil war 0.96
was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following civil war 0.94
was practiced despite passage of amendments following war 0.93
was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war 0.92
was practiced despite passage 0.92
was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following war 0.91
was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments prohibiting following civil war 0.90
was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following war 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following war)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following civil war)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following war)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following civil war)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following war)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following war)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following civil war)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following war)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following civil war)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following war)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following civil war)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following war)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following civil war)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following war)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following war)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following war)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following civil war)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following war)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following civil war)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following war)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following war)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments following war)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments following war)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of constitutional amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage following civil war)