seminar: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, training
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.62
, experience
Weight: 0.62
Siblings conference
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.36
, lecture
Weight: 0.35
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, exposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
CAN good 0.81
has quality difference 0.80
be good for job 0.78
have bad reputation 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(training, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(training, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(training, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(exposition, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality definition)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(training, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(experience, be good for job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lecture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(conference, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(exposition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(exposition, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conference, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality definition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality worth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality definition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality definition)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality definition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(training, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(conference, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(exposition, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(training, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)