senator: be chosen in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents politician
Weight: 0.76
, democrat
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings senate
Weight: 0.69
, governor
Weight: 0.65
, cicero
Weight: 0.51
, congressman
Weight: 0.40
, bill clinton
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chosen in canada 1.00
be chosen in pennsylvania 0.78
be chosen 0.77
be choosen 0.76
be chosen today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(congressman, be chosen)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(governor, be chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(congressman, be chosen)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(congressman, be chosen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(governor, be chosen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(governor, be chosen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(senator, be chosen in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(senator, be choosen)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(senator, be choosen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen in pennsylvania)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen in pennsylvania)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen today)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(senator, be chosen in pennsylvania)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(senator, be chosen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(senator, be chosen in pennsylvania)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(senator, be choosen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(senator, be chosen today)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(senator, be chosen)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen today)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(senator, be chosen today)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(senator, be choosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(congressman, be chosen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(governor, be chosen)