sense: be compared to hardcore history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents common sense
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feeling
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sight
Weight: 0.64
, pursuit
Weight: 0.49
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, fairness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be compared to hardcore history 1.00
be bad compared to most animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(common sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(common sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(common sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(common sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sense, be bad compared to most animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(common sense, be compared to hardcore history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sense, be compared to hardcore history)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(common sense, be compared to hardcore history)