sensitivity: be important in communication process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, characteristic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings allergy
Weight: 0.56
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, density
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication process 1.00
be important to things 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(density, be important to things)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(density, be important to things)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(density, be important to things)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sensitivity, be important in communication process)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sensitivity, be important to things)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(sensitivity, be important to things)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sensitivity, be important to things)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important in communication process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sensitivity, be important in communication process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important in communication process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(density, be important to things)